Ebook Adam Clarke's Commentary on the BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference
Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference. Is this your extra time? Exactly what will you do then? Having extra or spare time is quite amazing. You can do every little thing without force. Well, we expect you to exempt you couple of time to review this book Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference This is a god e-book to accompany you in this free time. You will certainly not be so tough to understand something from this book Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference A lot more, it will certainly assist you to obtain much better information and experience. Even you are having the terrific tasks, reading this e-book Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference will certainly not include your mind.
Adam Clarke's Commentary on the BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference
Ebook Adam Clarke's Commentary on the BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference
Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference. In undertaking this life, lots of people constantly attempt to do and obtain the most effective. New understanding, experience, driving lesson, and every little thing that could improve the life will certainly be done. However, many individuals in some cases really feel puzzled to obtain those things. Feeling the restricted of experience and also sources to be much better is among the lacks to have. Nevertheless, there is a really straightforward point that can be done. This is just what your teacher constantly manoeuvres you to do this. Yeah, reading is the response. Reading a book as this Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference and other recommendations could enrich your life top quality. How can it be?
To get over the trouble, we now give you the technology to purchase guide Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference not in a thick printed data. Yeah, checking out Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference by on-line or getting the soft-file simply to read can be one of the means to do. You might not feel that reviewing an e-book Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference will certainly be helpful for you. Yet, in some terms, May people effective are those that have reading practice, included this sort of this Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference
By soft data of the book Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference to review, you may not have to bring the thick prints all over you go. Any sort of time you have eager to check out Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference, you could open your kitchen appliance to review this publication Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference in soft file system. So simple and fast! Reviewing the soft data book Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference will provide you simple method to read. It could also be faster because you could read your e-book Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference all over you desire. This on the internet Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference can be a referred e-book that you could delight in the remedy of life.
Since publication Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference has great benefits to check out, many individuals now expand to have reading habit. Supported by the developed modern technology, nowadays, it is simple to get guide Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference Even the publication is not existed yet on the market, you to browse for in this internet site. As what you could locate of this Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference It will truly ease you to be the very first one reading this book Adam Clarke's Commentary On The BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference and also get the advantages.
For more than a century, Adam Clarke's Commentary on the Bible has served as an invaluable guide to the Bible for pastors and students the world over. Clarke's monumental work is reverd for its thorough and authoritative scholarship that transcends even the broadest spectrum of theological barriers and differences. Adam Clarke's standard six-volume work has been abridged by Ralph Earle - revered as a leading twentieth century biblical scholar in his own right.
- Sales Rank: #1475879 in Books
- Brand: Brand: Nelson Reference
- Published on: 1997-07-02
- Ingredients: Example Ingredients
- Format: Abridged
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 2.28" h x 6.77" w x 9.59" l,
- Binding: Hardcover
- 1360 pages
- Used Book in Good Condition
Most helpful customer reviews
13 of 13 people found the following review helpful.
The Earle & Clarke Exposition
By Vic Reasoner
Adam Clarke was once considered a dunce, yet he learned twenty languages. He overcame his fears to become the most able biblical scholar of his time in the English-speaking world. When he died the Conference recorded in its minutes, "No man is any age of the church, was ever known for so long a period, to have attracted larger audiences." Three times Clarke was elected president of the British Conference of the Methodist Church.
Yet Clarke is known primarily for his commentary on the entire Bible. Before he began the commentary, he translated the whole Bible from the original languages. Unlike W. B. Godbey who dictated his random thoughts to a secretary, Clarke spent thirty years of hard work on his commentary.
Milton S. Terry wrote in 1885 that next to Matthew Henry, no commentary of similar scope and magnitude "has had a wider circulation or is better known than the commentary of Adam Clarke."
From the first edition which quickly sold out in 1810, his commentary has remain in print until the present. However, in 1967, Ralph Earle produced a one volume abridged edition. Earle stated that dated or extraneous material was eliminated and I would concede that the commentary does contain extraneous material. My concern is that Earle has omitted Clarke's teaching at one significant point while claiming to allow "the great scholar to speak for himself."
In the Preface Earle claims "the actual words of Adam Clarke have not been changed, except to modernize the language and to abbreviate where appropriate." Judge for yourself.
At Ezekiel 36:27 Earle omits one half of one page, including Clarke's comment that "true Christians are those who are filled with the nature and Spirit of Christ."
Jesus said in John 3:5, "Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." Clarke wrote,
Reader, hast thou never had any other baptism than that of water? If thou hast not had any other, take Jesus Christ's word for it, thou canst not, in thy present state, enter into the kingdom of God. I would not say to thee merely, read what it is to be born of the Spirit: but pray, pray to God incessantly, till He give thee to feel what is implied in it! Remember, it is Jesus only who baptizes with the Holy Ghost. He who receives not this baptism has neither right nor title to the kingdom of God; nor can he with any propriety be termed a Christian, because that which essentially distinguished the Christian dispensation from that of the Jews was, that its author baptized all His followers with the Holy Ghost.
Ralph Earle omitted this entire paragraph.
Where Jesus teaches His disciples that the Holy Spirit is with them and will be in them (John 14:17), Clarke explains:
It is certain the Holy Spirit was not yet given to the disciples so as to dwell in them; this St. John himself assures us, 7:39. And it is evidently of that Spirit and its influences, which was not given till the day of pentecost, that our Lord here speaks.
Ralph Earle has omitted this paragraph.
At Acts 2:28 Peter preached, "Repent, and be baptized everyone of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of sins; and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost." Clarke points out:
In reference to the remission or removal of sins: baptism pointing out the purifying influences of the Holy Spirit; [and it is in reference to that purification that it is administered, and should in consideration never be separated from it. For baptism itself purifies not the conscience; it only points out the grace by which this is to be done. If ye faithfully use the sign, ye shall get the substance.]
Clarke is making a connection between Spirit baptism and water baptism (see also Clarke's Christian Theology, 255). Earle omits everything bracketed which does not allow this connection to be made.
Earle sees Acts 8:14-17 as an experience subsequent to conversion. He believes "unquestionably, the receiving of the Spirit was subsequent to conversion" [Beacon Bible Commentary, 7:353]. Clarke, however, said the gift of the Spirit was "certainly not for the sanctification of the souls of the people.... It was the miraculous gifts of the Spirit which were thus communicated."
Where Paul was filled with the Spirit in Acts 9:17, Clarke comments that prior to this point in time Paul "was not even a Christian; and the Holy Ghost, which he received now, was given more to make him a thorough Christian convert than to make him an apostle."
Earle omits this reference. However, Earle believes that "one is filled with the Holy Spirit when his heart is cleansed from all sin in the experience of entire sanctification" [Beacon, 7:305].
When Cornelius receives the Spirit and is then baptized in water, Clarke again makes the tie between Spirit baptism and water baptism (Acts 10:47).
These had evidently received the Holy Ghost, and consequently were become members of the mystical body of Christ; and yet St. Peter requires that they shall receive baptism by water, that they might become members of the Christian Church.
Clarke concludes by noting that the baptism of the Spirit did not supersede the baptism by water, "nor indeed can it."
Earle quotes the paragraph, but omits the concluding note. However, in Earle's own commentary on Acts, he states the experience of cornelius is "commonly known as entire sanctification" [Beacon, 7:380].
At Acts 11:16 Clarke observed that the promise of the Spirit's baptism was made to all "who should believe on Jesus Christ." Earle let this statement stand, but omitted Clarke's closing comment, "Hence we learn that the promise of the Holy Spirit is given to the whole body of Christians - to all that believe on Christ as dying for their sins, and rising for their justification."
Two verses later it is recorded that at the household of Cornelius God granted the Gentiles repentance unto life. Clarke says they embraced the Christian religion. Earle omits this reference.
At Acts 19 Earle does let stand Clarke's note that the Ephesian disciples "therefore were not Christians." Earle, however, omits the following paragraph:
And to this day the genuine disciples of Christ are distinguished from all false religionists, and from nominal Christians, by being made partakers of this Spirit, which enlightens their minds, and convinces of sin, righteousness, and judgment; quickens their souls, witnesses to their conscience that they are the children of God, and purifies their hearts. Those who have not received these blessings from the Holy Spirit, whatever their profession may be, know nothing better than John's baptism: good, excellent in its kind, but ineffectual to the salvation of those who live under the meridian of Christianity.
In Earle's own commentary he states that those who have believed and entered the Christian faith still need to be filled with the Spirit as a subsequent experience [Beacon, 7:477].
At Romans 8:9 Clarke can almost be heard preaching.
God made man in union with Himself, and his heart was His temple. Sin being committed, the temple was defiled, and God abandoned it. Jesus Christ is come by His sacrifice and Spirit to cleanse the temple, and make man again a habitation of God through the Spirit. And when this almighty Spirit again makes the heart His residence, then the soul is delivered from the moral effects of the fall. And that this is absolutely necessary to our present peace and final salvation is proved from this: that if any man have not the Spirit of Christ - the mind that was in him, produced there by the power of the Holy Ghost - he is none of His; he does not belong to the kingdom, flock, or family of God. This is an awful conclusion! Reader, lay it to heart.
Earle did not see fit to include anything cited above. At Ephesians 1:13 Clarke said:
The Holy Spirit, which is promised to them who believe on Christ Jesus, was given to you and thus you were ascertained to be the children of God, for God hasnot child who is not a partaker of the Holy Ghost, and he who has this Spirit has God's seal that he belongs to the heavenly family.
At 1 John 4:18 Clarke exhorts:
Let such earnestly seek, and fervently believe on the Son of God; and he will son give them another baptism of his Spirit, will purge out all the old leaven, and fill their whole souls with that love which is the fulfilling of the law.
This exhortation was omitted by Earle.
Ralph Earle said he found it "difficult to understand the almost universal neglect in the Christian Church of the baptism of the Holy Spirit" [The Gospel According to Mark, 30]. However, he omits most of Clarke's references to Spirit baptism. This is probably because Clarke did not connect Spirit baptism exclusively to entire sanctification.
Wesley Tracy concluded, "Clarke strongly emphasized the Holy Spirit in conversion." In entire sanctification the believer is baptized with a great effusion of the Spirit, but Clarke did not connect Pentecost and the experience of sanctification "in any direct way" [When Adam Clarke Preached, People Listened, 124]. However, Earle does in his commentary [Beacon, 7:274].
Who gave Ralph Earle the authority to edit out those passages which do not fit his theology and publish the results under Clarke's name? If the holiness movement teaches the same doctrine as early Methodism, why was so much editing necessary? How many people will think they are actually reading Clarke when they are only reading a sanitized version? Perhaps Clarke should have been abridged by someone who was more sympathetic to Clarke's theology.
Thomas Oden has raised his voice against "modern Chauvinists" which he defines as:
"those who have decided that there is precious little worth learning from any premodern voice. They assume the intrinsic inferiority of all premodern texts and the intrinsic superiority of all modern methods of investigation of those texts [Life in the Spirit, 469].
In the early history of our nation the Lewis & Clark Expedition paved the way for expansion. However, the Earle & Clarke Exposition leads to suppression of the truth.
37 of 41 people found the following review helpful.
Shame On This Abridgement!
By A Customer
As a student of the Bible for the past ten years, I've read some of the finest commentaries from the world's greatest scholars. One thing I noticed early on is that almost every writer quoted Dr.Adam Clarke and made reference to his Bible commentary. The information always quoted was to say the least, inspiring and insightful, so, I knew one day I would have to own Dr. Clarke's great commentary on the Bible. The unfortunate news of that the abridger, Ralph Earle, has removed extremely important information such as the correct order of chapters of the book of Jeremiah which is NOT the way it appears in our current Old Testament, and the 39 verses in 1 Samuel which are of doubtful authenticity and which didn't appear in the original text. I gave three stars to give praise to Dr. Clarke for being one of the world's greatest Biblical scholars, but not five stars because of the unacceptable, irresponsible job done by abridger, Ralph Earle. Perhaps we should all seek out hard-to-find copies of the original work, or purchase the unabriged version on CD-Rom. A word to the wise: stay away from abridgements! Biblical students are the loser here thanks to this abridgment.
12 of 16 people found the following review helpful.
Shame On This Abridgement!
By A Customer
As a student of the Bible for over a decade, I've read countless commentaries on the Old and New Testaments. Most of these great authors kept quoting Dr. Adam Clarke. The information always quoted from Dr. Clarke was to say the least awe-inspiring, so I knew I had to purchase this commentary one day. The unfortunate news is that the abridger Ralph Earle has removed extremely important information such as the correct order of chapters of Jeremiah (which are incorrect in our current Bibles), as well as the 39 verses in 1 Samuel which are of doubtful authenticity, and should not have been included in the Holy Bible account. The book get three stars because I wanted to give Dr. Adam Clarke his deserved praise, but not a five star rating because of the irresponsible job done by Ralph Earle. We should all seek out the original 3-book series, or if out-of-print, search for the unabridged version on CD-Rom.
Adam Clarke's Commentary on the BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference PDF
Adam Clarke's Commentary on the BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference EPub
Adam Clarke's Commentary on the BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference Doc
Adam Clarke's Commentary on the BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference iBooks
Adam Clarke's Commentary on the BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference rtf
Adam Clarke's Commentary on the BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference Mobipocket
Adam Clarke's Commentary on the BibleFrom Brand: Nelson Reference Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar